Rekontekstualisasi Peran Tata Bahasa dalam Akuisisi Bahasa Kedua: Telaah Kritis Teori Monitor Krashen

Anang Fajar Hasbi; Nurjannah Kasmilah; Muhammad Farkhan; Vina Navirul Ummah

doi:10.35719/pba.v5i1.179

Authors

Anang Fajar Hasbi Sekolah Pascasarjana, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Nurjannah Kasmilah Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Muhammad Farkhan Fakultas Adab dan Humaniora, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Vina Navirul Ummah UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35719/pba.v5i1.179

Keywords:

Monitor Theory, second language acquisition, grammar, conscious learning, meaningful input

Abstract

This article revisits the role of grammar in second language acquisition through a critical approach to the Monitor Theory developed by Stephen D. Krashen. This theory positions grammar as an aid or monitor in the language learning process, not as the primary focus of acquisition. Using a literature review method, this article analyses Krashen's views and compares them with contemporary theories and empirical findings from experts such as Ellis, Swain, Schmidt, and Lightbown & Spada. The results of the study indicate that although explicit grammar instruction plays a role in improving written accuracy and understanding complex structures, effective language acquisition still depends on exposure to meaningful input (comprehensible input) and the use of language in real communication contexts. Therefore, this article emphasises the importance of a balanced approach between grammar learning and contextual language experience. It is hoped that this article will contribute to the development of a more adaptive language pedagogy that is in line with the needs of today's learners.

Author Biography

Muhammad Farkhan, Fakultas Adab dan Humaniora, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Prof. Dr. Muhammad Farkhan. M.Pd., merupakan guru besar linguistik terapan pada fakultas Adab dan Humaniora UIN Jakarta. Beliau berkontribusi besar dalam memberikan referensi dan pengarahan dalam menyusun artikel ini.

References

Bieńkowska, I., & Polok, K. (2019). Teaching English as a Second/Foreign Language to CAPD-Impaired Students. OALib, 06(07), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105511

Burt, M. K. (1975). Error Analysis in the Adult EFL Classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586012

Cummins, J., & Swain, M. (1986). Communicative competence: some rules of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.). In Input in second language acquisition (1st Editio, hal. 22). Newbury House Publishers.

Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (2000). Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(1), 123–124. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0272263100281059

Ellis, R. (1995). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/l461005209

Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., Lambert, C., Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., Lambert, C., Bednarek, M., Levis, J. M., Hyland, K., & Treffers-daller, J. (2019). Task-Based Language Teaching. 2016.

Fotos, & Nasaji. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context (ESL & Applied Linguistics Professional Series), Hossein Nassaji and Sandra Fotos, Publisher: Routlege, ISBN: 978-0-415-80205-5, Pages: 167. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 453. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2011.1.3.8

Istiqomah, H., & Al-Badrani, M. J. H. (2020). Characteristic of Teaching Materials for Arabic Reading Skill with Inductive Approach. Izdihar : Journal of Arabic Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 3(2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.22219/jiz.v3i2.11193

Jarvis, G. (1985). Fundamental Concept of Language Teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(2), 251–253. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0272263100005416

Jegerski, J. (2021). Krashen and second language processing. Foreign Language Annals, 54(2), 318–323. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12557

Krashen, S. D. (1983). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. In TESOL

Quarterly (Vol. 17, Nomor 2). https://doi.org/10.2307/3586656

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammaring. Thomson/Heinle. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=evbt

Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2021). How Languages Are Learned 5th Edition. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=7GUzEAAAQBAJ

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0272263197001034

Manshur, U. (2017). Teaching Arabic to the Indonesian Student from a Functional Perspecive (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.33650/IJATL.V1I1.278

Ridge, E. (2013). R. Ellis: The study of second language acquisition. Per Linguam, 10. https://doi.org/10.5785/10-1-248

SASAKI, M. (2007). Effects of Study-Abroad Experiences on EFL Writers: A Multiple-Data Analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 602–620. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00625.x

Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129

Truscott, J. (1996). The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x

Zed, M. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=zG9sDAAAQBAJ